Thursday, December 17, 2009

Fairy Tales & Soulmates

The same day that I finished chatting with Hannah Seligson (author of soon-to-be-published A Little Bit Married), a male friend posted the music video of Taylor Swift's Love Story on facebook with the description: "song about fairy tales". I guess I have been living under a rock in the musical sense, because I don't know Swift or the song. But I couldn't help laughing as soon as I saw the video. Hannah's comment immediately came to mind: "The fairy tale is corrosive, as one psychologist I interviewed put it. We need to stamp out the notion of the soulmate like we did with smallpox."

Anyway, I will post my chat with Hannah when A Little Bit Married is launched on 15 January 2010, which will give a bit more context to her remark. In the meantime, I hope everyone continues to believe in Santa Claus at least!

Labels:

Digg!

Monday, December 14, 2009

CNNGo NoHo Party: 6:30-9:30pm, 15 December (Tuesday)

Check out CNNGo's unofficial launch party tomorrow: NoHo Streets of Your City.


Labels: ,

Digg!

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Another yoga mat moment: intuition

I had an amazing yoga class yesterday. For the first time in my years of yoga practice, I did a one-legged wheel. But what was amazing was not that I did it, but how I came to do it.

It was towards the end of Wendy's yoga class yesterday. We were doing wheel (a backbend pose where both hands and feet are on the ground and the rest of the body lifts off the ground forming an inverted "u"). Normally, this pose puts a lot of pressure on my wrists (probably because I'm not grounding through my feet enough) and I can usually only hold the pose for a few breaths. While I'm coming down, the more advanced yogis in the class are usually going through other variations like lifting one leg or arm off the ground or standing up from the pose. Yesterday, as we were in our first wheel, Wendy, in her usual soothing voice, tells the class: "Sometimes we can't do something, because we tells ourselves that we can't. If we stop believing that we can't, we just might do it." Or some variation of the same theme; as I can't remember her exact words. As I heard those words, I decided to stop thinking I couldn't do it. Once that decision was made, I felt like I was somehow on auto-pilot observing myself. I observed my feet to moving closer together (normally, teachers only tell us to move our feet closer towards our hands). In that moment of shifting the feet towards each other, I suddenly felt that one leg could hold the weight and I lifted my right leg up. I got as far as getting my leg half way up. But as soon as I registered surprise and disbelief that my leg was up in the air, I panicked and tumbled down from the pose. But in the second set, I started first with my left leg and then right leg and managed both times to lift one leg up completely without falling out of the pose.

It was interesting to observe that once I stopped believing I couldn't do the pose, my body revealed the solution, which was to move my feet closer together. In hindsight, it's an obvious solution, because that's how one does a one-legged bridge. So essentially, the body knew what to do all along, only the mind was not ready.

We hear it all the time -- the power of positive thinking. But it seems we can cognitively agree with something without really believing in it. So perhaps the phrase is incorrect. It's not so much positive thinking, but positive belief. I'm not sure how much of yesterday's achievement had been primed by my dim sum chat with AS about vipassana meditation.

I have always been a bit of a meditation sceptic; wanting to believe yet not really believing that meditation is useful (I mean, how can sitting and doing nothing be useful?), at least not enough to give up 10 days of my life to it. Ever since AS went on the 10-day meditation retreat in 2007 and raved about it though, my curiosity about it has been piqued. AS only told me yesterday what prompted him to go on the retreat and the effects therafter. It had been a very stressful period in his life and he had started noticing that he was suffering from memory loss. He would wake up in the morning, go to the bathroom and walk out wondering whether he had brushed his teeth or not. His doctor suggested that he get tested by the specialists at UCSF's Memory & Aging Center. There's a long waiting time to get an appointment there. It so happened that he completed the vipassana retreat the day before flying off to UCSF. Once at UCSF, he was put through a series of concentration and memory tests (In one exercise, he would be told a series of numbers and was asked to recall them in reverse order. He managed to go up to 17 digits!). The tests revealed that, far from suffering memory loss or deterioration, AS was actually scoring off the charts! Of course, he acknowledged it could have been akin to the placebo effect. But nonetheless, it illustrates the power of the mind to manipulate itself into doing unexpected things if we just let it. And my little one-legged wheel moment on the yoga mat further confirmed that. All of which is convincing me to put a 10-day vipassana retreat onto my 2010 to-do list.

This point makes me think of my students as well. I've been grading their final exams and noticed that most had not been able to correctly calculate a per person cost when given total trip costs. It's a simple calculation, yet many ended up with a per person cost that was nearly as high as total trip costs for 25 people. As I graded the papers, I kept wondering why they would overlook/accept this obviously non-sensical number. I believe that most of the students, despite having previously done the calculations correctly in their own homework and group project assignments, continue to believe that they do not know how to do the calculation. I can only imagine that the belief in their own lack of competence clouded even their most basic common sense. I wish I could have taught them how to trust their own intuition and logic more rather than relying on standard formulas. But of course, I myself am still just a student learning to trust and have faith in my own intuition.

Labels: , ,

Digg!

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Tom Ford on Spirituality...

Love this quote: "Just because one is spiritual doesn't mean that one does not like crocodile and cashmere."


Tom Ford on His Midlife Crisis from The Daily Beast Video on Vimeo.

His film, A Single Man, starring Colin Firth and Julianne Moore, looks like a visual feast, but the trailer left me clueless as to what the movie is actually about. Google solved that: it's based on Christopher Isherwood's novel by the same title about a gay English professor dealing with grief from the death of his longtime partner.

Labels:

Digg!

Wednesday, December 09, 2009

Creativity and Status

I am sitting at the front of a lecture theatre at HK Polytechnic University watching over 36 students taking the final exam for the Travel Product Development & Distribution class (a ridiculously pretentious sounding name for a very common sense-driven subject). So I've been catching up on Jonah Lehrer's blog and which led me to this interesting article in Scientific American by Adam Waytz: The Psychology of Social Status. Waytz opens:
Nobel Laureate economist, John Harsanyi, said that “apart from economic payoffs, social status seems to be the most important incentive and motivating force of social behavior.” The more noticeable status disparities are, the more concerned with status people become...
His point seems so relevant as I reflect on the students' attitude towards learning. I had allocated the final, 3-hour session as a review session. I had asked the students to prepare their questions on anything they did not understand or needed elaboration. They came prepared only with one question: "What questions are on the final exam?" It was a total waste of a session and they knew it because half the class left after the break. It's all about the grade, getting the degree, how future employers perceive their worth etc. The students recognize and appreciate passion and creativity (they were all inspired by the four guest speakers who were doing new and creative things in the travel business). Yet, many do not feel empowered to be more than what is expected of them.

Waytz goes on to explain in his article that low status individuals can attain high status within a group by demonstrating worth ("competence and selflessness") among his/her social connections within the group. Note that the word is "demonstrate" (perception is key). Even if an individual is connected and competent, but does not demonstrate it, that individual will not move up the status ladder.

Both economic payoffs and social status in Hong Kong has been tied to maintaining stability/protecting the status quo. But if Hong Kong is really serious about tackling our problems (pollution, growing income gap, unmotivated and uninspired youth), we will need to nurture and accommodate a more creative, status quo-challenging culture. How can we confer creative people more status? It means giving them a voice and a hand in influencing and shaping policies both economic and political. There's a simple word for this, isn't there? Democracy.

This question is: are enough people willing to take on the added responsibility required for a real democracy?

Labels: , ,

Digg!

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

Above the Table with Angie Wong



I've been a regular consumer of Angie's Under the Table column in Time Out HK. Lately, every time I see Angie, I've complained about the lack of surprising new restaurants in Hong Kong. Angie would dutifully throw out a few new restaurants. But ultimately, she would end up agreeing that there was really nothing new and exciting to rave about.

So when an email promoting a new Korean fusion restaurant popped up in my inbox, despite the fact that it was located in TST's Miramar shopping center, I forwarded it to Angie because I wanted to find out what Korean fusion is. We decided to check it out for lunch.

"Want to walk through K11 afterward?" she asked.

"sounds like a lovely lunch date! i wonder how i can script it to end up in your column? ;-)" I replied.

"Invite my ex-boyfriends? I'm sure we'll find debauchery at lunch," she emailed back.

"if we don't find it, we can surely create it," I wrote back.

In the end, the restaurant was nothing to write about. K11 is just another shopping mall. And we didn't find or create any debauchery. Instead, we had a discussion about the fate of media, how there really is no such thing as lifestyle journalism (assuming that journalism implies objectivity), and how all our moments and experiences seem to be brought to us by [insert brand here]. Angie recounted a recent Tiffany & Co. moment, and we chatted about how the way we experience travel these days is through so many media filters. When we go to a new destination, we already have in our minds an idea of what we should be experiencing as pre-packaged by whatever media we have consumed: FT's How to Spend It versus a show on Discovery Travel & Living versus television shows and movies.

"How can you accept it (advertising/marketing-driven editorial, the seeming lack of authenticity of our experiences)?" Angie asked with a how-can-you-give-up-the-good-fight tone.

And here, I felt another one of those I-really-must-be-getting-old moments. "Because I'm half a decade older than you are," I replied. "And I've had more time to come to terms with the fact that I'm just as avid and guilty a consumer, as well as a producer, of all this fakeness." Interestingly, our luncheon conversation left me feeling quite serene.

When I got back to the office, I came across these pages in a fascinating new book of interesting statistics culled from Jonathan Harris' We Feel Fine website. I found it interesting that Asians expressed more feelings of anger and fear than people on other continents around the world, while also expressing the least amount of joy (What are Asians angry and fearful about?). Unsurprisingly, Americans expressed the most joy (we are "hopeless optimists", as many of my non-American friends have pointed out):



Labels: , ,

Digg!

Saturday, December 05, 2009

BYOB Pop Up Party!

BYOB POP UP PARTY!
Come celebrate the completion of Daniel Wu, Edward Huang, Teddy Lo and LED Artist’s installation!

Date
Monday, December 7, 2009
Time
6pm - 11pm
Venue
THE STAGE, West Kowloon Waterfront Promenade



We’ve created a very special and unique space with this bamboo structure and we want to share it with you! So…BYOB, bring your booze, bring your skate board, bring your bike, bring a chair, bring your ipod, bring your friends, bring some meat for the bbq that will going, but most importantly BRING YOURSELVES!!!

Visit http://hkszbiennale.org for updates!

Labels: , , ,

Digg!

MAD 2010: 22-24 January 2010

I feel old. I just applied to attend MAD 2010 (MAD stands for Make-A-Difference), and at the end of the application form, it stated that applicants under 30 years old would be given priority for the 800 spaces for "selected young people". So I guess I am not a young person anymore. Having said that, I'd still encourage anyone interested in attending to apply. The line-up of speakers is amazing (Sir Ken Robinson, John Maeda and Alex Counts, just to name a few), and the three-day conference to be held at Kwai Tsing Theatre only costs HK$600.


Labels: , , ,

Digg!

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

It's a beautiful day in Hong Kong, but...

...air quality sucks. Support the Clean Air Network.

Labels:

Digg!

Hong Kong: An Innovative Society?

Last month, when M called to update me on the funding situation for the upcoming Hong Kong Shenzhen Bi-city Biennale of Urbanism \ Architecture, I was stupefied. M and her team of curators had laboured tirelessly for months to put together a world-class event, bringing together international icons such as Shigeru Ban and Diller+Scofidio Renfro with the leading lights of Hong Kong's creative scene to engage the public on issues of architecture and urban development at the West Kowloon Waterfront Promenade. With a rich program of interactive, immersive exhibitions, M found that the original government grant was insufficient to fund everything. So she knocked on many a charitable doors for sponsorship, among them was one of Hong Kong's most well-endowed charities. Excitement was high when weeks ago, the charity was about to sign a cheque. And all of us volunteering to help out on various bits of the biennale were elated. But then came M's call -- the government was not going to give her the approval to accept the additional funding. The biennale had to be scaled down. "WTF??!!" was my reaction. I was at a loss to believe that this absurd situation was happening here in Hong Kong, a city that aims to be a breeding ground for innovation and creativity.

I had been reading John W. Gardner's Self Renewal: The Individual and the Innovative Society. Jacqueline Novogratz's article in the Stanford Social Innovation Review had inspired me to order the book from amazon. And at only 127 pages, I was motivated to read it as soon as it arrived. Like Novogratz, I found Gardner's words of wisdom resonating with me. At every opportunity, I have touted Gardner's book as though it were gospel. When in fact, it is simple common sense. His words resonate because they accurately describe the reality of our human condition, and not just at a moment in time but over the course of our development.




I had told M and E, both curators for the Biennale, about the book and they invited me to write a brief essay on my reflections for the Biennale catalogue. I still had the bitter aftertaste of M's funding news on my mind when I started to write the essay. I wanted to explain why so many Hong Kong people lament its rigid, almost anti-innovation atmosphere, and how it is no fault of those who settle on conformity and convention. Afterall, I would have understood if none of the four curators wanted to organize another government-funded Biennale. Thankfully, I was saved from my pessimism by my students.

I was reminded that renewal is not the result of one heroic creative act or innovative invention, it is the sum of many seemingly inconsequential decisions and actions (and on a societal level, by many people over lifetimes) that have probably, on balance, lead to more failures than successes. But I do believe that, on balance, the trend line points towards evolution and progress, rather than the demise of our species (that is, until the next gigantic meteor hits and we go the way of the dinosaurs). As a teacher, I have come to realize that the most important thing teachers can give students is not our knowledge but our faith in them. In fact, we all need someone to believe in us in our moments of doubt as we navigate our place in an increasingly complex world.

This is the essay I submitted:

What Teaching Has Taught Me About Creativity and Innovation

Creativity and innovation cannot be imported, transplanted nor taught; there is no masterplan or formula, right or wrong way, to being creative and innovative. These fruits are borne only when nurtured by certain values in a warm and open environment. As John W. Gardner explains in his incredibly insightful book, Self Renewal: The Individual and the Innovative Society, the difference between a vibrant, thriving society and a rigid and decaying one is simply whether it “provides for its own continuous renewal.”

And how does a society continually innovate and renew itself? The answer lies in its individuals, whether they themselves are self-renewing. Self-renewing people share certain characteristics – a sustained curiosity about themselves and the world around them (they understand that their knowledge of both is limited and continually strive to expand and break limiting patterns of their understanding), courage to fail and be wrong, capacity for compassion and an internally-derived motivation to persevere at an endeavour out of a belief that it is worthwhile or meaningful.

These past few months, I have had the pleasure of teaching a class at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’s School of Hospitality and Tourism Management. It has been an enlightening and inspiring experience, where the teacher has been the student. My class of 36, final year Higher Diploma Tourism Management students have taught me to consider what we need to provide younger generations if we are to expect them to inherit the task of renewing our society.
The first day of class, by way of introductions, I asked the students to share their dreams. For most, it was to one day become rich. To understand why they wanted to be rich, I asked them to draw a picture of their image of “rich”. Most drew a free-standing house. In this class about creating and marketing innovative travel products, I also learned that most preferred to travel to new destinations with tour groups rather than explore on their own, because they feared the unknown.

Hong Kong has come a long way in its economic development since Gardner’s book was first published nearly half a century ago. In class, I introduced Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs – at the bottom of the pyramid are survival and safety, at the top, self-actualization. For people to feel free and daring enough to experiment, they must first feel safe and secure. Can an individual feel safe and secure when the notion of a home of one’s own seems but a fantasy for most young graduates today?

When asked to share what their aspirations were, three students replied: “none”. Why have they lost the hope to aspire? Why are they fearful? And how can I, as a teacher, and we, as a society, create a safe and nurturing environment for the younger generation to freely explore, take risks, fail, discover, gain confidence and learn? While the students have raised these questions in my mind, the most important lesson I have learned from them is faith. Renewal is a process, not an event. This Biennale bears testament to that. BYOB -- Bring Your Own Biennale.

Labels: , , , , ,

Digg!